Information Technology stock comparison

MU vs SNPS: which business are you actually underwriting?

Micron Technology (MU) is the larger business by reported revenue: $37.4B in its fiscal year ended Aug 2025, about 5.3× SNPS's $7.1B (fiscal year ended Oct 2025). MU's net margin was 22.8% and SNPS's 18.9%. The SEC classifies them differently (Semiconductors & Related Devices; Services-Prepackaged Software); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry.

Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.

Sector
Information Technology
SEC industry
Different
Separate classifications
Fiscal year ends
Different
MU September 3 · SNPS October 31
Reviewed
Dec 22, 2025

MU vs SNPS: quick comparison

Company factMUSNPS
CompanyMicron Technology, Inc.Synopsys, Inc.
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
HeadquartersBoise, Idaho—
Founded1978—
SEC industrySemiconductors & Related DevicesServices-Prepackaged Software
Fiscal year-endSeptember 3October 31
Latest annual filing10-K · 2025-10-0310-K · 2025-12-22

MU vs SNPS: audited financials

  • Scale: MU's $37.4B of revenue is about 5.3× SNPS's $7.1B.
  • Net margin: MU kept 22.8% of revenue as net income versus 18.9% at SNPS.
  • Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled MU 46.9% of revenue, or 2.05× net income; SNPS 21.5% of revenue, or 1.14× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
  • Periods: the fiscal years end about 2 months apart (2025-08-28 for MU, 2025-10-31 for SNPS), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.

MU: FY ending 2025-08-28 · SNPS: FY ending 2025-10-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

Where MU and SNPS overlap, and where they don't

Overlap

  • Shared research theme: Artificial intelligence.

Differences

  • Different SEC industries: MU files as Semiconductors & Related Devices; SNPS as Services-Prepackaged Software.
  • Offset fiscal calendars: MU's year ends September 3 and SNPS's October 31, about 2 months apart.
  • Only MU maps to Tariffs & trade.
  • Scale: MU reported about 5.3× the annual revenue of SNPS.

Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.

Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS)

Synopsys develops electronic design automation software and semiconductor IP used to design and verify complex chips.

What moves each company

Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.

What moves MU

  • DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue
  • High-bandwidth memory (HBM) qualification and share at AI accelerator customers
  • NAND pricing and data-center SSD demand
  • Capital expenditure and the timing of new fab capacity

What moves SNPS

We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for SNPS. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2025-12-22.

The investment question

You now know MU reports about 5.3× SNPS's revenue, and MU keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to artificial intelligence, including “DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue” at MU, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.

Members-only research

Members-only research on MU and SNPS

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. MU's fiscal year ends September 3, while SNPS's ends October 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 31 matched transaction rows for MU and 17 matched transaction rows for SNPS. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

MU vs SNPS FAQs

Are MU and SNPS direct competitors?

Not necessarily. Micron Technology files as Semiconductors & Related Devices and Synopsys as Services-Prepackaged Software. The pair is compared because both map to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.

Is MU or SNPS the bigger company by revenue?

Micron Technology (MU) is the larger business by reported revenue: $37.4B in its fiscal year ended Aug 2025, about 5.3× SNPS's $7.1B (fiscal year ended Oct 2025). MU's net margin was 22.8% and SNPS's 18.9%. The SEC classifies them differently (Semiconductors & Related Devices; Services-Prepackaged Software); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.

Which is better, MU or SNPS?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this MU vs SNPS comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Micron Technology, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-26. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-26. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?

MU vs SNPS compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included