AMD vs MU: how the two businesses compare

  • Similar size: MU and AMD each brought in about $37.4B of yearly revenue.
  • More profitable: MU keeps 23 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 13 cents at AMD.
  • More cash from each sale: MU turns 47 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 22 cents at AMD.

From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.

Micron Technology (MU) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) reported similar revenue: $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025) versus $34.6B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). AMD's net margin was 12.5% and MU's 22.8%. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 3674 (Semiconductors & Related Devices).

Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.

Sector
Information Technology
SEC industry
Semiconductors & Related Devices
Same classification
Fiscal year ends
Different
AMD December 26 · MU September 2
Reviewed
Oct 9, 2026

AMD vs MU: quick comparison

Company factAMDMU
CompanyAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.Micron Technology, Inc.
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
HeadquartersSanta Clara, CaliforniaBoise, Idaho
Founded19691978
SEC industrySemiconductors & Related DevicesSemiconductors & Related Devices
Fiscal year-endDecember 26September 2
Latest annual filing10-K/A · 2026-02-0410-K · 2026-10-09

AMD vs MU: audited financials

  • Scale: revenue is roughly in line ($37.4B for MU versus $34.6B for AMD).
  • Net margin: MU kept 22.8% of revenue as net income versus 12.5% at AMD.
  • Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled AMD 22.3% of revenue, or 1.78× net income; MU 46.9% of revenue, or 2.05× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
  • Periods: the fiscal years end about 4 months apart (2025-12-27 for AMD, 2025-08-28 for MU), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.

AMD: FY ending 2025-12-27 · MU: FY ending 2025-08-28. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

Where AMD and MU overlap, and where they don't

Overlap

  • Same SEC industry: both report under SIC 3674, Semiconductors & Related Devices.
  • Shared research themes: Artificial intelligence and Tariffs & trade.

Differences

  • Offset fiscal calendars: AMD's year ends December 26 and MU's September 2, about 4 months apart.
  • Profitability: net margin of 12.5% for AMD versus 22.8% for MU.

Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)

AMD designs CPUs and GPUs for PCs, servers, and gaming consoles, positioning itself as the primary challenger to both Intel and NVIDIA. Its data-center accelerators are central to its ambitions in the AI compute market.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.

What moves each company

Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.

What moves AMD

  • Data Center revenue from EPYC server CPUs and Instinct GPU accelerators
  • Execution on the OpenAI 6-gigawatt deployment agreement and MI450 ramp
  • Client and Gaming demand for Ryzen processors and semi-custom console chips
  • U.S. export controls on MI308 shipments to China

What moves MU

  • DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue
  • High-bandwidth memory (HBM) qualification and share at AI accelerator customers
  • NAND pricing and data-center SSD demand
  • Capital expenditure and the timing of new fab capacity

The investment question

You now know how AMD and MU are classified, when their fiscal years end, and where their exposures overlap. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about “Data Center revenue from EPYC server CPUs and Instinct GPU accelerators” at AMD and “DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue” at MU, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.

Members-only research

Members-only research on AMD and MU

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.

Read the full research

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. AMD's fiscal year ends December 26, while MU's ends September 2. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 50 matched transaction rows for AMD and 36 matched transaction rows for MU. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

AMD vs MU FAQs

Are AMD and MU direct competitors?

Advanced Micro Devices and Micron Technology share the SEC industry classification “Semiconductors & Related Devices.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.

Is AMD or MU the bigger company by revenue?

Micron Technology (MU) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) reported similar revenue: $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025) versus $34.6B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). AMD's net margin was 12.5% and MU's 22.8%. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 3674 (Semiconductors & Related Devices). Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.

Which is better, AMD or MU?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this AMD vs MU comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?

AMD vs MU compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.

$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included