Yield Theory

Information Technology stock comparison

AMAT vs AMD: which business are you actually underwriting?

Compare Applied Materials, Inc. with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
Sector
Information
Industry
Same SIC
Shared themes
2
Updated
2026-02-04

AMAT vs AMD: quick comparison

Company factAMATAMD
CompanyApplied Materials, Inc.Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
HeadquartersSanta Clara, CaliforniaSanta Clara, California
Founded19671969
SEC industrySemiconductors & Related DevicesSemiconductors & Related Devices
Fiscal year-endOctober 26December 26
Latest annual filing10-K · 2025-12-1210-K/A · 2026-02-04

AMAT vs AMD: audited financials

AMD reported about 1.2× the revenue of AMAT in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, AMAT converted a larger share of revenue into net income (24.7% versus 12.5%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.

MetricAMATAMD
Revenue$28.4B$34.6B
Net income$7.0B$4.3B
Operating cash flow$8.0B$7.7B
Diluted EPS$8.66$2.65
Net margin24.7%12.5%

AMAT: FY ending 2025-10-26 · AMD: FY ending 2025-12-27. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

How the businesses differ

Why this pair belongs in the comparison set

AMAT and AMD share the SEC industry classification “Semiconductors & Related Devices,” giving the comparison a primary-source operating relationship. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT)

Applied Materials makes the manufacturing equipment that chipmakers use to fabricate semiconductors. As the largest supplier in its field, its orders serve as a leading indicator of industry capital spending.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)

AMD designs CPUs and GPUs for PCs, servers, and gaming consoles, positioning itself as the primary challenger to both Intel and NVIDIA. Its data-center accelerators are central to its ambitions in the AI compute market.

The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. AMAT is classified by the SEC as Semiconductors & Related Devices, while AMD is classified as Semiconductors & Related Devices. The matching industry code strengthens the peer comparison, although product mix can still differ materially.

Members-only research

We've published in-depth research on AMD

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

Which thesis does each company fit?

Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.

Study AMAT when…

  • The AI capital-expenditure cycle
  • Interest rates and the cost of long-duration growth
  • Enterprise IT budgets and cloud migration
  • Export controls and the US–China chip race

Study AMD when…

  • Data Center revenue from EPYC server CPUs and Instinct GPU accelerators
  • Execution on the OpenAI 6-gigawatt deployment agreement and MI450 ramp
  • Client and Gaming demand for Ryzen processors and semi-custom console chips
  • U.S. export controls on MI308 shipments to China

Shared research themes

Artificial intelligenceTariffs & trade

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.AMAT's fiscal year ends October 26, while AMD's ends December 26. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 28matched transaction rows for AMATand 50 for AMD. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

AMAT vs AMD FAQs

Are AMAT and AMD direct competitors?

Applied Materials, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. share the SEC industry classification “Semiconductors & Related Devices.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.

Which is better, AMAT or AMD?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this AMAT vs AMD comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Applied Materials, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

A comparison is the setup. The thesis is the call.

AMAT vs AMD shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included