Intel Corporation (INTC)
Intel is a historic leader in microprocessors that is investing heavily to rebuild its manufacturing edge and build a foundry business for outside customers. Its US fabs make it a focal point of domestic chip policy.
INTC vs MU: how the two businesses compare
- Bigger business: INTC, with $52.9B of yearly revenue, about 1.4× MU's $37.4B.
- More profitable: MU keeps 23 cents of each sales dollar as profit; INTC lost money over the year.
- More cash from each sale: MU turns 47 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 18 cents at INTC.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
Intel (INTC) is the larger business by reported revenue: $52.9B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 1.4× MU's $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). INTC's net margin was -0.5% and MU's 22.8%. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 3674 (Semiconductors & Related Devices).
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Information Technology
- Semiconductors & Related Devices
- Same classification
- Different
- INTC December 27 · MU September 3
- Jan 23, 2026
INTC vs MU: quick comparison
| Company fact | INTC | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Intel Corporation | Micron Technology, Inc. |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, California | Boise, Idaho |
| Founded | 1968 | 1978 |
| SEC industry | Semiconductors & Related Devices | Semiconductors & Related Devices |
| Fiscal year-end | December 27 | September 3 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-01-23 | 10-K · 2025-10-03 |
INTC vs MU: audited financials
- Scale: INTC's $52.9B of revenue is about 1.4× MU's $37.4B.
- Net margin: MU kept 22.8% of revenue as net income versus -0.5% at INTC.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled INTC 18.3% of revenue; MU 46.9% of revenue, or 2.05× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: the fiscal years end about 4 months apart (2025-12-27 for INTC, 2025-08-28 for MU), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.
| Metric | INTC | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.9B2024-12-29 to 2025-12-27 · SEC filing | $37.4B2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Net income | −$267M2024-12-29 to 2025-12-27 · SEC filing | $8.5B2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $9.7B2024-12-29 to 2025-12-27 · SEC filing | $17.5B2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.062024-12-29 to 2025-12-27 · SEC filing | $7.592024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | -0.5%2024-12-29 to 2025-12-27 · SEC filing | 22.8%2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
INTC: FY ending 2025-12-27 · MU: FY ending 2025-08-28. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where INTC and MU overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Same SEC industry: both report under SIC 3674, Semiconductors & Related Devices.
- Shared research themes: Artificial intelligence and Tariffs & trade.
Differences
- Offset fiscal calendars: INTC's year ends December 27 and MU's September 3, about 4 months apart.
- Profitability: net margin of -0.5% for INTC versus 22.8% for MU.
- INTC reported a net loss of $267M in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves INTC
- Intel 18A yield and volume ramp for client and server CPUs
- External foundry customer wins needed to justify Intel 14A
- Client and data-center CPU volume, pricing, and share versus AMD and Arm-based rivals
- Capital spending, fab construction pace, and government and strategic equity funding
What moves MU
- DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue
- High-bandwidth memory (HBM) qualification and share at AI accelerator customers
- NAND pricing and data-center SSD demand
- Capital expenditure and the timing of new fab capacity
The investment question
You now know INTC reports about 1.4× MU's revenue, and MU keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about “Intel 18A yield and volume ramp for client and server CPUs” at INTC and “DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue” at MU, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
Members-only research on INTC and MU
- Intel’s manufacturing option needs a cash-flow bridge
What Intel’s recovery evidence showed on January 23, 2026.
- The HBM Capacity Trade
Micron’s HBM capacity thesis as the evidence stood on December 18, 2025.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. INTC's fiscal year ends December 27, while MU's ends September 3. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 45 matched transaction rows for INTC and 31 matched transaction rows for MU. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
INTC primary filings
MU primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
INTC vs MU FAQs
Are INTC and MU direct competitors?
Intel and Micron Technology share the SEC industry classification “Semiconductors & Related Devices.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.
Is INTC or MU the bigger company by revenue?
Intel (INTC) is the larger business by reported revenue: $52.9B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 1.4× MU's $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). INTC's net margin was -0.5% and MU's 22.8%. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 3674 (Semiconductors & Related Devices). Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, INTC or MU?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this INTC vs MU comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Intel Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-10-03. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-10-03. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
INTC vs MU compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included