Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.
Information Technology stock comparison
MU vs QCOM: which business are you actually underwriting?
Compare Micron Technology, Inc. with QUALCOMM Incorporated using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
- Sector
- Information
- Industry
- Different SIC
- Shared themes
- 3
- Updated
- 2025-11-05
MU vs QCOM: quick comparison
| Company fact | MU | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Micron Technology, Inc. | QUALCOMM Incorporated |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Headquarters | Boise, Idaho | San Diego, California |
| Founded | 1978 | 1985 |
| SEC industry | Semiconductors & Related Devices | Radio & Tv Broadcasting & Communications Equipment |
| Fiscal year-end | September 3 | September 27 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2025-10-03 | 10-K · 2025-11-05 |
How the businesses differ
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
Qualcomm designs the mobile chipsets and wireless-modem technology that power much of the smartphone industry, and it licenses a deep patent portfolio. It is broadening into automotive, PCs, and on-device AI.
The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. MU is classified by the SEC as Semiconductors & Related Devices, while QCOM is classified as Radio & Tv Broadcasting & Communications Equipment. The different industry codes are a warning against treating sector membership as proof of identical economics.
Which thesis does each company fit?
Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.
Study MU when…
- The AI capital-expenditure cycle
- Interest rates and the cost of long-duration growth
- Enterprise IT budgets and cloud migration
- Export controls and the US–China chip race
Study QCOM when…
- The AI capital-expenditure cycle
- Interest rates and the cost of long-duration growth
- Enterprise IT budgets and cloud migration
- Export controls and the US–China chip race
Shared research themes
Artificial intelligenceUS marketsTariffs & trade
SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.MU's fiscal year ends September 3, while QCOM's ends September 27. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House Clerk snapshot contains 1matched transaction row for MUand 0 for QCOM. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
MU primary filings
QCOM primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
MU vs QCOM FAQs
Are MU and QCOM direct competitors?
Micron Technology, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated sit in the same Information Technology sector but have different SEC industry classifications. The comparison is most useful for portfolio role and sector exposure, not as a claim that every product competes directly.
Which is better, MU or QCOM?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this MU vs QCOM comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices, then use the primary filings here to test the business thesis.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-08-10. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-08-10. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Go beyond MU vs QCOM.
Yield Theory connects filings, capital flows, catalysts, and risks into an investable research process.
$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included