Information Technology stock comparison

MU vs ORCL: which business are you actually underwriting?

Oracle (ORCL) is the larger business by reported revenue: $67.4B in its fiscal year ended May 2026, about 1.8× MU's $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). MU's net margin was 22.8% and ORCL's 25.2%. The SEC classifies them differently (Semiconductors & Related Devices; Services-Prepackaged Software); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry.

Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.

Sector
Information Technology
SEC industry
Different
Separate classifications
Fiscal year ends
Different
MU September 3 · ORCL May 31
Reviewed
Jun 22, 2026

MU vs ORCL: quick comparison

Company factMUORCL
CompanyMicron Technology, Inc.Oracle Corporation
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
HeadquartersBoise, IdahoAustin, Texas
Founded19781977
SEC industrySemiconductors & Related DevicesServices-Prepackaged Software
Fiscal year-endSeptember 3May 31
Latest annual filing10-K · 2025-10-0310-K · 2026-06-22

MU vs ORCL: audited financials

  • Scale: ORCL's $67.4B of revenue is about 1.8× MU's $37.4B.
  • Net margin: ORCL kept 25.2% of revenue as net income versus 22.8% at MU.
  • Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled MU 46.9% of revenue, or 2.05× net income; ORCL 47.5% of revenue, or 1.88× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
  • Periods: the fiscal years end about 9 months apart (2025-08-28 for MU, 2026-05-31 for ORCL), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.

MU: FY ending 2025-08-28 · ORCL: FY ending 2026-05-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

Where MU and ORCL overlap, and where they don't

Overlap

  • Shared research theme: Artificial intelligence.

Differences

  • Different SEC industries: MU files as Semiconductors & Related Devices; ORCL as Services-Prepackaged Software.
  • Offset fiscal calendars: MU's year ends September 3 and ORCL's May 31, about 9 months apart.
  • Only MU maps to Tariffs & trade.
  • Scale: ORCL reported about 1.8× the annual revenue of MU.

Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

Oracle runs one of the world's most widely used database platforms and has pivoted aggressively into cloud infrastructure and applications. Its cloud regions have become a favored home for large AI training workloads.

What moves each company

Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.

What moves MU

  • DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue
  • High-bandwidth memory (HBM) qualification and share at AI accelerator customers
  • NAND pricing and data-center SSD demand
  • Capital expenditure and the timing of new fab capacity

What moves ORCL

  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure capacity additions and data-center build-out
  • Migration of software support customers to cloud applications and infrastructure
  • Renewal of software support contracts on the installed license base
  • Capital spending and borrowing to fund data-center expansion

The investment question

You now know ORCL reports about 1.8× MU's revenue, and ORCL keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about “DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue” at MU and “Oracle Cloud Infrastructure capacity additions and data-center build-out” at ORCL, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.

Members-only research

Members-only research on MU and ORCL

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. MU's fiscal year ends September 3, while ORCL's ends May 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 31 matched transaction rows for MU and 48 matched transaction rows for ORCL. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

MU vs ORCL FAQs

Are MU and ORCL direct competitors?

Not necessarily. Micron Technology files as Semiconductors & Related Devices and Oracle as Services-Prepackaged Software. The pair is compared because both map to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.

Is MU or ORCL the bigger company by revenue?

Oracle (ORCL) is the larger business by reported revenue: $67.4B in its fiscal year ended May 2026, about 1.8× MU's $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). MU's net margin was 22.8% and ORCL's 25.2%. The SEC classifies them differently (Semiconductors & Related Devices; Services-Prepackaged Software); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.

Which is better, MU or ORCL?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this MU vs ORCL comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Micron Technology, Inc. and Oracle Corporation tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-26. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-26. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?

MU vs ORCL compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included