Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)
Gilead is a biopharmaceutical company with leadership in HIV and viral-disease treatments. It has expanded into oncology through acquisitions and its cell-therapy platform.
Health Care stock comparison
| Company fact | GILD | MRNA |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | Moderna, Inc. |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Headquarters | Foster City, California | — |
| Founded | 1987 | — |
| SEC industry | Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances) | Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances) |
| Fiscal year-end | December 31 | December 31 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-02-24 | 10-K · 2026-02-20 |
GILD reported about 15.1× the revenue of MRNA in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, GILD converted a larger share of revenue into net income (28.9% versus -145.2%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.
| Metric | GILD | MRNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.4B | $1.9B |
| Net income | $8.5B | −$2.8B |
| Operating cash flow | $10.0B | −$1.9B |
| Diluted EPS | $6.78 | −$7.26 |
| Net margin | 28.9% | -145.2% |
GILD: FY ending 2025-12-31 · MRNA: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
GILD and MRNA share the SEC industry classification “Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances),” giving the comparison a primary-source operating relationship. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.
Gilead is a biopharmaceutical company with leadership in HIV and viral-disease treatments. It has expanded into oncology through acquisitions and its cell-therapy platform.
Moderna develops messenger-RNA vaccines and therapeutics, including its COVID-19 vaccine.
The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. GILD is classified by the SEC as Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances), while MRNA is classified as Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances). The matching industry code strengthens the peer comparison, although product mix can still differ materially.
Members-only research
Sep 22, 2026
Meta jumped 11%. What must happen next to justify the price?A member research report on Meta’s AI rally: Muse, subscription economics, the cash-flow burden, legal costs and the earnings assumptions behind the new price.
Feb 23, 2026
Newmont and the gap between a gold rally and shareholder cashA February 23, 2026 historical cutoff tests whether portfolio simplification and cost control could turn stronger gold economics into cash.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.
Read the full researchUse the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.GILD's fiscal year ends December 31, while MRNA's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 19matched transaction rows for GILDand 5 for MRNA. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Moderna, Inc. share the SEC industry classification “Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances).” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Moderna, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
GILD vs MRNA shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.
Members-only research
$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included