Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM)
Akamai operates a global content-delivery network and cloud security services that speed up and protect websites.
AKAM vs FICO: how the two businesses compare
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) and Fair Isaac (FICO) do not both have comparable annual revenue in the SEC XBRL snapshot, so this comparison rests on business descriptions, classifications, and filings. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 7389 (Services-Business Services, NEC).
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Information Technology
- Business Services, NEC
- Same classification
- Different
- AKAM December 31 · FICO September 30
- Nov 6, 2026
AKAM vs FICO: quick comparison
| Company fact | AKAM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Fair Isaac Corporation |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| SEC industry | Services-Business Services, NEC | Services-Business Services, NEC |
| Fiscal year-end | December 31 | September 30 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-02-20 | 10-K · 2026-11-06 |
Where AKAM and FICO overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Same SEC industry: both report under SIC 7389, Services-Business Services, NEC.
Differences
- Offset fiscal calendars: AKAM's year ends December 31 and FICO's September 30, about 3 months apart.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO)
Fair Isaac develops the FICO credit score and analytics software used by lenders to assess consumer risk.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves AKAM
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for AKAM. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-20.
What moves FICO
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for FICO. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-11-06.
The investment question
You now know how AKAM and FICO are classified, when their fiscal years end, and where their exposures overlap. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about the services-business services, nec cycle, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
- Issue 07: The Vote That Knocked Almost a Quarter off Data Center Stocks
Texas has frozen new data center approvals since the summer. The vote extends that freeze, but it cannot unplug campuses that already have power. We map who is exposed, test whether the sell-off overshot and say where the real risk sits.
- Citadel bought the AI fire sale. The seller had run out of time.
Up 439% in the first half, down about 67% in July: how an AI hedge fund ended up selling a roughly $16 billion stock book to Citadel at a discount.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. AKAM's fiscal year ends December 31, while FICO's ends September 30. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 11 matched transaction rows for AKAM and 7 matched transaction rows for FICO. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
AKAM primary filings
FICO primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
More comparisons involving AKAM or FICO
AKAM vs FICO FAQs
Are AKAM and FICO direct competitors?
Akamai Technologies and Fair Isaac share the SEC industry classification “Services-Business Services, NEC.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.
Which is better, AKAM or FICO?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this AKAM vs FICO comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
AKAM vs FICO compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included