Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
Ralph Lauren designs and markets premium apparel, accessories, and home goods under its namesake lifestyle brands.
Consumer Discretionary stock comparison
RL vs TPR: which business are you actually underwriting?
Compare Ralph Lauren Corporation with Tapestry, Inc. using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
- Sector
- Consumer
- Industry
- Different SIC
- Shared themes
- 1
- Updated
- 2026-08-13
RL vs TPR: quick comparison
| Company fact | RL | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Ralph Lauren Corporation | Tapestry, Inc. |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| SEC industry | Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments | Leather & Leather Products |
| Fiscal year-end | March 28 | June 27 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-05-21 | 10-K · 2026-08-13 |
RL vs TPR: audited financials
RL reported revenue roughly in line with TPR in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, TPR converted a larger share of revenue into net income (19.1% versus 11.6%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.
| Metric | RL | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1B | $8.0B |
| Net income | $941M | $1.5B |
| Operating cash flow | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Diluted EPS | $15.11 | $7.27 |
| Net margin | 11.6% | 19.1% |
RL: FY ending 2026-03-28 · TPR: FY ending 2026-06-27. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
How the businesses differ
Why this pair belongs in the comparison set
RL and TPR have different SEC industry classifications, but both map to the maintained International markets research theme inside the Consumer Discretionary sector. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR)
Tapestry owns the Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman accessories and fashion brands.
The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. RL is classified by the SEC as Men's & Boys' Furnishgs, Work Clothg, & Allied Garments, while TPR is classified as Leather & Leather Products. The different industry codes are a warning against treating sector membership as proof of identical economics.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
Sep 22, 2026
Meta jumped 11%. What must happen next to justify the price?A member research report on Meta’s AI rally: Muse, subscription economics, the cash-flow burden, legal costs and the earnings assumptions behind the new price.
Feb 23, 2026
Newmont and the gap between a gold rally and shareholder cashA February 23, 2026 historical cutoff tests whether portfolio simplification and cost control could turn stronger gold economics into cash.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.
Read the full researchWhich thesis does each company fit?
Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.
Study RL when…
- Real wage growth and consumer confidence
- Interest rates on autos and big-ticket credit
- Inventory cycles and promotional intensity
- The trade-down between premium and value
Study TPR when…
- Real wage growth and consumer confidence
- Interest rates on autos and big-ticket credit
- Inventory cycles and promotional intensity
- The trade-down between premium and value
Shared research themes
International markets
SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.RL's fiscal year ends March 28, while TPR's ends June 27. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 0matched transaction rows for RLand 6 for TPR. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
RL primary filings
TPR primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
RL vs TPR FAQs
Are RL and TPR direct competitors?
Ralph Lauren Corporation and Tapestry, Inc. sit in the same Consumer Discretionary sector but have different SEC industry classifications. The comparison is most useful for portfolio role and sector exposure, not as a claim that every product competes directly.
Which is better, RL or TPR?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this RL vs TPR comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Ralph Lauren Corporation and Tapestry, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
A comparison is the setup. The thesis is the call.
RL vs TPR shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.
Members-only research
$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included