Yield Theory

Information Technology stock comparison

MPWR vs NVDA: which business are you actually underwriting?

Compare Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. with NVIDIA Corporation using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
Sector
Information
Industry
Same SIC
Shared themes
1
Updated
2026-02-27

MPWR vs NVDA: quick comparison

Company factMPWRNVDA
CompanyMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.NVIDIA Corporation
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
Headquarters—Santa Clara, California
Founded—1993
SEC industrySemiconductors & Related DevicesSemiconductors & Related Devices
Fiscal year-endDecember 31January 31
Latest annual filing10-K · 2026-02-2710-K · 2026-02-25

MPWR vs NVDA: audited financials

NVDA reported about 77.4× the revenue of MPWR in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, NVDA converted a larger share of revenue into net income (55.6% versus 22.3%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.

MetricMPWRNVDA
Revenue$2.8B$215.9B
Net income$621M$120.1B
Operating cash flow$838M$102.7B
Diluted EPS$12.86$4.90
Net margin22.3%55.6%

MPWR: FY ending 2025-12-31 · NVDA: FY ending 2026-01-25. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

How the businesses differ

Why this pair belongs in the comparison set

MPWR and NVDA share the SEC industry classification “Semiconductors & Related Devices,” giving the comparison a primary-source operating relationship. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)

Monolithic Power Systems designs high-efficiency power-management chips for computing, automotive, and consumer electronics.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVIDIA makes the graphics processors and data-center accelerators that train and run most modern AI models. Its chips have become the default hardware of the AI boom, making it a bellwether for the entire sector.

The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. MPWR is classified by the SEC as Semiconductors & Related Devices, while NVDA is classified as Semiconductors & Related Devices. The matching industry code strengthens the peer comparison, although product mix can still differ materially.

Members-only research

We've published in-depth research on NVDA

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

Which thesis does each company fit?

Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.

Study MPWR when…

  • The AI capital-expenditure cycle
  • Interest rates and the cost of long-duration growth
  • Enterprise IT budgets and cloud migration
  • Export controls and the US–China chip race

Study NVDA when…

  • The AI capital-expenditure cycle
  • Interest rates and the cost of long-duration growth
  • Enterprise IT budgets and cloud migration
  • Export controls and the US–China chip race

Shared research themes

Artificial intelligence

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.MPWR's fiscal year ends December 31, while NVDA's ends January 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 6matched transaction rows for MPWRand 178 for NVDA. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

MPWR vs NVDA FAQs

Are MPWR and NVDA direct competitors?

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation share the SEC industry classification “Semiconductors & Related Devices.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.

Which is better, MPWR or NVDA?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this MPWR vs NVDA comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

A comparison is the setup. The thesis is the call.

MPWR vs NVDA shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included