Information Technology stock comparison

JBL vs MU: which business are you actually underwriting?

Micron Technology (MU) is the larger business by reported revenue: $37.4B in its fiscal year ended Aug 2025, about 1.3× JBL's $29.8B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). JBL's net margin was 2.2% and MU's 22.8%. The SEC places them in related industries (Printed Circuit Boards; Semiconductors & Related Devices), and both map to the Tariffs & trade research theme.

Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.

Sector
Information Technology
SEC industry
Different
Separate classifications
Fiscal year ends
Different
JBL August 31 · MU September 3
Reviewed
Oct 17, 2025

JBL vs MU: quick comparison

Company factJBLMU
CompanyJabil Inc.Micron Technology, Inc.
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
Headquarters—Boise, Idaho
Founded—1978
SEC industryPrinted Circuit BoardsSemiconductors & Related Devices
Fiscal year-endAugust 31September 3
Latest annual filing10-K · 2025-10-1710-K · 2025-10-03

JBL vs MU: audited financials

  • Scale: MU's $37.4B of revenue is about 1.3× JBL's $29.8B.
  • Net margin: MU kept 22.8% of revenue as net income versus 2.2% at JBL.
  • Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled JBL 5.5% of revenue, or 2.50× net income; MU 46.9% of revenue, or 2.05× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
  • Periods: the fiscal years end 3 days apart (2025-08-31 and 2025-08-28), so these annual figures cover close to the same months.

JBL: FY ending 2025-08-31 · MU: FY ending 2025-08-28. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

Where JBL and MU overlap, and where they don't

Overlap

  • Related SEC industries: both sit in SIC major group 36.
  • Shared research theme: Tariffs & trade.
  • Nearly aligned fiscal calendars: JBL's year ends August 31 and MU's September 3.

Differences

  • Different four-digit SIC codes: JBL is 3672 (Printed Circuit Boards); MU is 3674 (Semiconductors & Related Devices).
  • Only MU maps to Artificial intelligence.
  • Profitability: net margin of 2.2% for JBL versus 22.8% for MU.

Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.

Jabil Inc. (JBL)

Jabil provides contract electronics manufacturing and supply-chain services for a broad range of hardware makers.

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)

Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.

What moves each company

Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.

What moves JBL

We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for JBL. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2025-10-17.

What moves MU

  • DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue
  • High-bandwidth memory (HBM) qualification and share at AI accelerator customers
  • NAND pricing and data-center SSD demand
  • Capital expenditure and the timing of new fab capacity

The investment question

You now know MU reports about 1.3× JBL's revenue, and MU keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to tariffs & trade, including “DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue” at MU, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.

Members-only research

Members-only research on JBL and MU

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. JBL's fiscal year ends August 31, while MU's ends September 3. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 0 matched transaction rows for JBL and 31 matched transaction rows for MU. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

JBL vs MU FAQs

Are JBL and MU direct competitors?

Not necessarily. Jabil files as Printed Circuit Boards and Micron Technology as Semiconductors & Related Devices. The pair is compared because both map to the Tariffs & trade research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.

Is JBL or MU the bigger company by revenue?

Micron Technology (MU) is the larger business by reported revenue: $37.4B in its fiscal year ended Aug 2025, about 1.3× JBL's $29.8B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). JBL's net margin was 2.2% and MU's 22.8%. The SEC places them in related industries (Printed Circuit Boards; Semiconductors & Related Devices), and both map to the Tariffs & trade research theme. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.

Which is better, JBL or MU?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this JBL vs MU comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Jabil Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-26. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-26. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?

JBL vs MU compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included