Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)
Hubbell makes electrical products and utility infrastructure equipment for grids and buildings.
HUBB vs SWK: how the two businesses compare
- Bigger business: SWK, with $15.1B of yearly revenue, about 2.6× HUBB's $5.8B.
- More profitable: HUBB keeps 15 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 3 cents at SWK.
- More cash from each sale: HUBB turns 18 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 6 cents at SWK.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is the larger business by reported revenue: $15.1B in its fiscal year ended Jan 2026, about 2.6× HUBB's $5.8B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). HUBB's net margin was 15.2% and SWK's 2.7%. The SEC classifies them differently (Electronic Components & Accessories; Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware); what connects them is shared exposure to the Economic trends research theme, not a common industry.
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Industrials
- Different
- Separate classifications
- Different
- HUBB December 31 · SWK January 2
- Feb 24, 2026
HUBB vs SWK: quick comparison
| Company fact | HUBB | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Hubbell Incorporated | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| SEC industry | Electronic Components & Accessories | Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware |
| Fiscal year-end | December 31 | January 2 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-02-12 | 10-K · 2026-02-24 |
HUBB vs SWK: audited financials
- Scale: SWK's $15.1B of revenue is about 2.6× HUBB's $5.8B.
- Net margin: HUBB kept 15.2% of revenue as net income versus 2.7% at SWK.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled HUBB 17.6% of revenue, or 1.16× net income; SWK 6.4% of revenue, or 2.42× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: the fiscal years end 3 days apart (2025-12-31 and 2026-01-03), so these annual figures cover close to the same months.
| Metric | HUBB | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.8B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $15.1B2024-12-29 to 2026-01-03 · SEC filing |
| Net income | $887M2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $402M2024-12-29 to 2026-01-03 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $1.0B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $971M2024-12-29 to 2026-01-03 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | $16.542025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $2.652024-12-29 to 2026-01-03 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | 15.2%2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | 2.7%2024-12-29 to 2026-01-03 · SEC filing |
HUBB: FY ending 2025-12-31 · SWK: FY ending 2026-01-03. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where HUBB and SWK overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Shared research theme: Economic trends.
- Nearly aligned fiscal calendars: HUBB's year ends December 31 and SWK's January 2.
Differences
- Different SEC industries: HUBB files as Electronic Components & Accessories; SWK as Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware.
- Only SWK maps to Tariffs & trade.
- Scale: SWK reported about 2.6× the annual revenue of HUBB.
- Profitability: net margin of 15.2% for HUBB versus 2.7% for SWK.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
Stanley Black & Decker makes power tools, hand tools, and industrial fastening products.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves HUBB
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for HUBB. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-12.
What moves SWK
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for SWK. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-24.
The investment question
You now know SWK reports about 2.6× HUBB's revenue, and HUBB keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to economic trends, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
- Issue 07: The Vote That Knocked Almost a Quarter off Data Center Stocks
Texas has frozen new data center approvals since the summer. The vote extends that freeze, but it cannot unplug campuses that already have power. We map who is exposed, test whether the sell-off overshot and say where the real risk sits.
- Citadel bought the AI fire sale. The seller had run out of time.
Up 439% in the first half, down about 67% in July: how an AI hedge fund ended up selling a roughly $16 billion stock book to Citadel at a discount.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. HUBB's fiscal year ends December 31, while SWK's ends January 2. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 20 matched transaction rows for HUBB and 1 matched transaction row for SWK. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
HUBB primary filings
SWK primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
More comparisons involving HUBB or SWK
HUBB vs SWK FAQs
Are HUBB and SWK direct competitors?
Not necessarily. Hubbell files as Electronic Components & Accessories and Stanley Black & Decker as Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware. The pair is compared because both map to the Economic trends research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.
Is HUBB or SWK the bigger company by revenue?
Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is the larger business by reported revenue: $15.1B in its fiscal year ended Jan 2026, about 2.6× HUBB's $5.8B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). HUBB's net margin was 15.2% and SWK's 2.7%. The SEC classifies them differently (Electronic Components & Accessories; Cutlery, Handtools & General Hardware); what connects them is shared exposure to the Economic trends research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, HUBB or SWK?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this HUBB vs SWK comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Hubbell Incorporated and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
HUBB vs SWK compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included