HP Inc. (HPQ)
HP Inc. makes personal computers, printers, and related supplies for consumers and businesses worldwide.
HPQ vs MU: how the two businesses compare
- Bigger business: HPQ, with $55.3B of yearly revenue, about 1.5× MU's $37.4B.
- More profitable: MU keeps 23 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 5 cents at HPQ.
- More cash from each sale: MU turns 47 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 7 cents at HPQ.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
HP (HPQ) is the larger business by reported revenue: $55.3B in its fiscal year ended Oct 2025, about 1.5× MU's $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). HPQ's net margin was 4.6% and MU's 22.8%. The SEC classifies them differently (Computer & office Equipment; Semiconductors & Related Devices); what connects them is shared exposure to the Tariffs & trade research theme, not a common industry.
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Information Technology
- Different
- Separate classifications
- Different
- HPQ October 31 · MU September 2
- Oct 9, 2026
HPQ vs MU: quick comparison
| Company fact | HPQ | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Company | HP Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| Headquarters | — | Boise, Idaho |
| Founded | — | 1978 |
| SEC industry | Computer & office Equipment | Semiconductors & Related Devices |
| Fiscal year-end | October 31 | September 2 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2025-12-10 | 10-K · 2026-10-09 |
HPQ vs MU: audited financials
- Scale: HPQ's $55.3B of revenue is about 1.5× MU's $37.4B.
- Net margin: MU kept 22.8% of revenue as net income versus 4.6% at HPQ.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled HPQ 6.7% of revenue, or 1.46× net income; MU 46.9% of revenue, or 2.05× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: the fiscal years end about 2 months apart (2025-10-31 for HPQ, 2025-08-28 for MU), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.
| Metric | HPQ | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $55.3B2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31 · SEC filing | $37.4B2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Net income | $2.5B2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31 · SEC filing | $8.5B2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $3.7B2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31 · SEC filing | $17.5B2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | $2.652024-11-01 to 2025-10-31 · SEC filing | $7.592024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | 4.6%2024-11-01 to 2025-10-31 · SEC filing | 22.8%2024-08-30 to 2025-08-28 · SEC filing |
HPQ: FY ending 2025-10-31 · MU: FY ending 2025-08-28. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where HPQ and MU overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Shared research theme: Tariffs & trade.
Differences
- Different SEC industries: HPQ files as Computer & office Equipment; MU as Semiconductors & Related Devices.
- Offset fiscal calendars: HPQ's year ends October 31 and MU's September 2, about 2 months apart.
- Only MU maps to Artificial intelligence.
- Profitability: net margin of 4.6% for HPQ versus 22.8% for MU.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
Micron is one of the few global producers of DRAM and NAND memory, components essential to computers, phones, and AI servers. Demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI accelerators has become a major growth driver.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves HPQ
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for HPQ. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2025-12-10.
What moves MU
- DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue
- High-bandwidth memory (HBM) qualification and share at AI accelerator customers
- NAND pricing and data-center SSD demand
- Capital expenditure and the timing of new fab capacity
The investment question
You now know HPQ reports about 1.5× MU's revenue, and MU keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to tariffs & trade, including “DRAM pricing and bit supply, which account for most of Micron's revenue” at MU, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
Members-only research on HPQ and MU
- The HBM Capacity Trade
Micron’s HBM capacity thesis as the evidence stood on December 18, 2025.
- Issue 07: The Vote That Knocked Almost a Quarter off Data Center Stocks
Texas has frozen new data center approvals since the summer. The vote extends that freeze, but it cannot unplug campuses that already have power. We map who is exposed, test whether the sell-off overshot and say where the real risk sits.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. HPQ's fiscal year ends October 31, while MU's ends September 2. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 3 matched transaction rows for HPQ and 36 matched transaction rows for MU. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
HPQ primary filings
MU primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
HPQ vs MU FAQs
Are HPQ and MU direct competitors?
Not necessarily. HP files as Computer & office Equipment and Micron Technology as Semiconductors & Related Devices. The pair is compared because both map to the Tariffs & trade research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.
Is HPQ or MU the bigger company by revenue?
HP (HPQ) is the larger business by reported revenue: $55.3B in its fiscal year ended Oct 2025, about 1.5× MU's $37.4B (fiscal year ended Aug 2025). HPQ's net margin was 4.6% and MU's 22.8%. The SEC classifies them differently (Computer & office Equipment; Semiconductors & Related Devices); what connects them is shared exposure to the Tariffs & trade research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, HPQ or MU?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this HPQ vs MU comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers HP Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
HPQ vs MU compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included