Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)
FIS provides banking and payments technology that powers financial institutions and merchants.
Financials stock comparison
FIS vs GPN: which business are you actually underwriting?
Compare Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. with Global Payments Inc. using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
- Sector
- Financials
- Industry
- Same SIC
- Shared themes
- 0
- Updated
- 2026-02-24
FIS vs GPN: quick comparison
| Company fact | FIS | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | Global Payments Inc. |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| SEC industry | Services-Business Services, NEC | Services-Business Services, NEC |
| Fiscal year-end | December 31 | December 31 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-02-24 | 10-K · 2026-02-20 |
FIS vs GPN: audited financials
FIS reported about 1.4× the revenue of GPN in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, GPN converted a larger share of revenue into net income (18.2% versus 3.6%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.
| Metric | FIS | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.7B | $7.7B |
| Net income | $382M | $1.4B |
| Operating cash flow | — | $2.7B |
| Diluted EPS | $0.73 | $5.78 |
| Net margin | 3.6% | 18.2% |
FIS: FY ending 2025-12-31 · GPN: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
How the businesses differ
Why this pair belongs in the comparison set
FIS and GPN share the SEC industry classification “Services-Business Services, NEC,” giving the comparison a primary-source operating relationship. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.
Global Payments Inc. (GPN)
Global Payments provides merchant payment processing and software for businesses.
The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. FIS is classified by the SEC as Services-Business Services, NEC, while GPN is classified as Services-Business Services, NEC. The matching industry code strengthens the peer comparison, although product mix can still differ materially.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
Sep 22, 2026
Meta jumped 11%. What must happen next to justify the price?A member research report on Meta’s AI rally: Muse, subscription economics, the cash-flow burden, legal costs and the earnings assumptions behind the new price.
Feb 23, 2026
Newmont and the gap between a gold rally and shareholder cashA February 23, 2026 historical cutoff tests whether portfolio simplification and cost control could turn stronger gold economics into cash.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.
Read the full researchWhich thesis does each company fit?
Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.
Study FIS when…
- The shape of the yield curve and net interest margins
- Credit quality and loan-loss provisions
- Regulation and capital requirements
- Deal activity and market volatility
Study GPN when…
- The shape of the yield curve and net interest margins
- Credit quality and loan-loss provisions
- Regulation and capital requirements
- Deal activity and market volatility
Shared research themes
Services-Business Services, NEC (SEC industry)
SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.FIS's fiscal year ends December 31, while GPN's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 21matched transaction rows for FISand 6 for GPN. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
FIS primary filings
GPN primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
More comparisons involving FIS or GPN
FIS vs GPN FAQs
Are FIS and GPN direct competitors?
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Global Payments Inc. share the SEC industry classification “Services-Business Services, NEC.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.
Which is better, FIS or GPN?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this FIS vs GPN comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Global Payments Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
A comparison is the setup. The thesis is the call.
FIS vs GPN shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.
Members-only research
$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included