Yield Theory

Industrials stock comparison

EME vs PWR: which business are you actually underwriting?

Compare EMCOR Group, Inc. with Quanta Services, Inc. using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
Sector
Industrials
Industry
Same SIC
Shared themes
1
Updated
2026-02-26

EME vs PWR: quick comparison

Company factEMEPWR
CompanyEMCOR Group, Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
ExchangeNYSENYSE
SEC industryElectrical WorkElectrical Work
Fiscal year-endDecember 31December 31
Latest annual filing10-K · 2026-02-2610-K · 2026-02-19

EME vs PWR: audited financials

PWR reported about 1.7× the revenue of EME in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, EME converted a larger share of revenue into net income (7.5% versus 3.7%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.

MetricEMEPWR
Revenue$17.0B$28.5B
Net income$1.3B$1.0B
Operating cash flow$1.3B$2.2B
Diluted EPS$28.19$6.80
Net margin7.5%3.7%

EME: FY ending 2025-12-31 · PWR: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

How the businesses differ

Why this pair belongs in the comparison set

EME and PWR share the SEC industry classification “Electrical Work,” giving the comparison a primary-source operating relationship. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME)

EMCOR Group provides electrical and mechanical construction and facilities services.

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

Quanta Services builds and maintains electric power grids, pipelines, and communications infrastructure.

The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. EME is classified by the SEC as Electrical Work, while PWR is classified as Electrical Work. The matching industry code strengthens the peer comparison, although product mix can still differ materially.

Members-only research

What members are reading this month

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

Which thesis does each company fit?

Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.

Study EME when…

  • Capital-spending and manufacturing PMIs
  • Reshoring and supply-chain reconfiguration
  • Defense budgets and geopolitical conflict
  • Freight rates and logistics demand

Study PWR when…

  • Capital-spending and manufacturing PMIs
  • Reshoring and supply-chain reconfiguration
  • Defense budgets and geopolitical conflict
  • Freight rates and logistics demand

Shared research themes

Economic trends

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.EME's fiscal year ends December 31, while PWR's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 14matched transaction rows for EMEand 30 for PWR. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

EME vs PWR FAQs

Are EME and PWR direct competitors?

EMCOR Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. share the SEC industry classification “Electrical Work.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.

Which is better, EME or PWR?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this EME vs PWR comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers EMCOR Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

A comparison is the setup. The thesis is the call.

EME vs PWR shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included