ECL vs EMN: how the two businesses compare

  • Bigger business: ECL, with $16.1B of yearly revenue, about 1.8× EMN's $8.8B.
  • More profitable: ECL keeps 13 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 5 cents at EMN.
  • More cash from each sale: ECL turns 18 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 11 cents at EMN.

From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.

Ecolab (ECL) is the larger business by reported revenue: $16.1B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 1.8× EMN's $8.8B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). ECL's net margin was 12.9% and EMN's 5.4%. The SEC places them in related industries (Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics; Plastic Materials, Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers), and both map to the Economic trends research theme.

Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.

Sector
Materials
SEC industry
Different
Separate classifications
Fiscal year ends
December 31
Same calendar
Reviewed
Feb 23, 2026

ECL vs EMN: quick comparison

Company factECLEMN
CompanyEcolab Inc.Eastman Chemical Company
ExchangeNYSENYSE
SEC industrySoap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, CosmeticsPlastic Materials, Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers
Fiscal year-endDecember 31December 31
Latest annual filing10-K · 2026-02-2310-K · 2026-02-13

ECL vs EMN: audited financials

  • Scale: ECL's $16.1B of revenue is about 1.8× EMN's $8.8B.
  • Net margin: ECL kept 12.9% of revenue as net income versus 5.4% at EMN.
  • Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled ECL 18.4% of revenue, or 1.42× net income; EMN 11.1% of revenue, or 2.05× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
  • Periods: both fiscal years end on 2025-12-31, so these annual figures cover the same months.

ECL: FY ending 2025-12-31 · EMN: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

Where ECL and EMN overlap, and where they don't

Overlap

  • Related SEC industries: both sit in SIC major group 28.
  • Shared research theme: Economic trends.
  • Same fiscal calendar: both fiscal years end December 31.

Differences

  • Different four-digit SIC codes: ECL is 2840 (Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics); EMN is 2821 (Plastic Materials, Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers).
  • Scale: ECL reported about 1.8× the annual revenue of EMN.
  • Profitability: net margin of 12.9% for ECL versus 5.4% for EMN.

Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.

Ecolab Inc. (ECL)

Ecolab provides water treatment, cleaning, and hygiene products and services to businesses.

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN)

Eastman Chemical makes specialty chemicals, plastics, and fibers for industrial and consumer uses.

What moves each company

Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.

What moves ECL

We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for ECL. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-23.

What moves EMN

We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for EMN. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-13.

The investment question

You now know ECL reports about 1.8× EMN's revenue, and ECL keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to economic trends, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.

Members-only research

What members are reading this month

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.

Read the full research

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. Both fiscal years end December 31, so annual reports line up, but check segment definitions before comparing growth or margins.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 9 matched transaction rows for ECL and 3 matched transaction rows for EMN. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

ECL vs EMN FAQs

Are ECL and EMN direct competitors?

Not necessarily. Ecolab files as Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics and Eastman Chemical as Plastic Materials, Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers. The pair is compared because both map to the Economic trends research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.

Is ECL or EMN the bigger company by revenue?

Ecolab (ECL) is the larger business by reported revenue: $16.1B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 1.8× EMN's $8.8B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). ECL's net margin was 12.9% and EMN's 5.4%. The SEC places them in related industries (Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics; Plastic Materials, Synth Resins & Nonvulcan Elastomers), and both map to the Economic trends research theme. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.

Which is better, ECL or EMN?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this ECL vs EMN comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Ecolab Inc. and Eastman Chemical Company tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?

ECL vs EMN compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.

$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included