Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG)
Conagra Brands makes packaged and frozen foods including Healthy Choice, Slim Jim, and Duncan Hines.
CAG vs MDLZ: how the two businesses compare
- Bigger business: MDLZ, with $38.5B of yearly revenue, about 3.4× CAG's $11.3B.
- More profitable: MDLZ keeps 6 cents of each sales dollar as profit; CAG lost money over the year.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is the larger business by reported revenue: $38.5B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 3.4× CAG's $11.3B (fiscal year ended May 2026). CAG's net margin was -17.0% and MDLZ's 6.4%. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 2000 (Food and Kindred Products).
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Consumer Staples
- Food and Kindred Products
- Same classification
- Different
- CAG May 30 · MDLZ December 31
- Jul 15, 2026
CAG vs MDLZ: quick comparison
| Company fact | CAG | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Conagra Brands, Inc. | Mondelez International, Inc. |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| Headquarters | — | Chicago, Illinois |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| SEC industry | Food and Kindred Products | Food and Kindred Products |
| Fiscal year-end | May 30 | December 31 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-07-15 | 10-K · 2026-02-04 |
CAG vs MDLZ: audited financials
- Scale: MDLZ's $38.5B of revenue is about 3.4× CAG's $11.3B.
- Net margin: MDLZ kept 6.4% of revenue as net income versus -17.0% at CAG.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled CAG 12.4% of revenue; MDLZ 11.7% of revenue, or 1.84× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: the fiscal years end about 5 months apart (2026-05-31 for CAG, 2025-12-31 for MDLZ), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.
| Metric | CAG | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.3B2025-05-26 to 2026-05-31 · SEC filing | $38.5B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net income | −$1.9B2025-05-26 to 2026-05-31 · SEC filing | $2.5B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $1.4B2025-05-26 to 2026-05-31 · SEC filing | $4.5B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | −$4.002025-05-26 to 2026-05-31 · SEC filing | $1.892025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | -17.0%2025-05-26 to 2026-05-31 · SEC filing | 6.4%2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
CAG: FY ending 2026-05-31 · MDLZ: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where CAG and MDLZ overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Same SEC industry: both report under SIC 2000, Food and Kindred Products.
Differences
- Offset fiscal calendars: CAG's year ends May 30 and MDLZ's December 31, about 5 months apart.
- Only MDLZ maps to International markets.
- Scale: MDLZ reported about 3.4× the annual revenue of CAG.
- Profitability: net margin of -17.0% for CAG versus 6.4% for MDLZ.
- CAG reported a net loss of $1.9B in its fiscal year ended May 2026.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)
Mondelez owns global snack brands including Oreo, Cadbury, and Ritz, with strong positions in chocolate and biscuits. A large emerging-market presence exposes it to both currency swings and commodity cocoa prices.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves CAG
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for CAG. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-07-15.
What moves MDLZ
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for MDLZ. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-04.
The investment question
You now know MDLZ reports about 3.4× CAG's revenue, and MDLZ keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about the food and kindred products cycle, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
- Issue 07: The Vote That Knocked Almost a Quarter off Data Center Stocks
Texas has frozen new data center approvals since the summer. The vote extends that freeze, but it cannot unplug campuses that already have power. We map who is exposed, test whether the sell-off overshot and say where the real risk sits.
- Citadel bought the AI fire sale. The seller had run out of time.
Up 439% in the first half, down about 67% in July: how an AI hedge fund ended up selling a roughly $16 billion stock book to Citadel at a discount.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. CAG's fiscal year ends May 30, while MDLZ's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 20 matched transaction rows for CAG and 20 matched transaction rows for MDLZ. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
CAG primary filings
MDLZ primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
More comparisons involving CAG or MDLZ
CAG vs MDLZ FAQs
Are CAG and MDLZ direct competitors?
Conagra Brands and Mondelez International share the SEC industry classification “Food and Kindred Products.” That makes the operating comparison relevant, but it does not prove that every product, customer, or revenue stream competes directly.
Is CAG or MDLZ the bigger company by revenue?
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is the larger business by reported revenue: $38.5B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 3.4× CAG's $11.3B (fiscal year ended May 2026). CAG's net margin was -17.0% and MDLZ's 6.4%. Both file with the SEC under the same industry code, SIC 2000 (Food and Kindred Products). Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, CAG or MDLZ?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this CAG vs MDLZ comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Conagra Brands, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
CAG vs MDLZ compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included