Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)
Autodesk makes design and engineering software such as AutoCAD and Revit used in architecture, construction, and manufacturing.
ADSK vs FTNT: how the two businesses compare
- Similar size: ADSK and FTNT each brought in about $7.2B of yearly revenue.
- More profitable: FTNT keeps 27 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 16 cents at ADSK.
- More cash from each sale: FTNT turns 38 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 34 cents at ADSK.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
Autodesk (ADSK) and Fortinet (FTNT) reported similar revenue: $7.2B (fiscal year ended Jan 2026) versus $6.8B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). ADSK's net margin was 15.6% and FTNT's 27.3%. The SEC classifies them differently (Services-Prepackaged Software; Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry.
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Information Technology
- Different
- Separate classifications
- Different
- ADSK January 31 · FTNT December 31
- Mar 3, 2026
ADSK vs FTNT: quick comparison
| Company fact | ADSK | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Autodesk, Inc. | Fortinet, Inc. |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| SEC industry | Services-Prepackaged Software | Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC |
| Fiscal year-end | January 31 | December 31 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-03-03 | 10-K · 2026-02-25 |
ADSK vs FTNT: audited financials
- Scale: revenue is roughly in line ($7.2B for ADSK versus $6.8B for FTNT).
- Net margin: FTNT kept 27.3% of revenue as net income versus 15.6% at ADSK.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled ADSK 34.0% of revenue, or 2.18× net income; FTNT 38.1% of revenue, or 1.40× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: the fiscal years end about 1 month apart (2026-01-31 for ADSK, 2025-12-31 for FTNT), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.
| Metric | ADSK | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.2B2025-02-01 to 2026-01-31 · SEC filing | $6.8B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net income | $1.1B2025-02-01 to 2026-01-31 · SEC filing | $1.9B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $2.5B2025-02-01 to 2026-01-31 · SEC filing | $2.6B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | $5.232025-02-01 to 2026-01-31 · SEC filing | $2.422025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | 15.6%2025-02-01 to 2026-01-31 · SEC filing | 27.3%2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
ADSK: FY ending 2026-01-31 · FTNT: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where ADSK and FTNT overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Shared research theme: Artificial intelligence.
Differences
- Different SEC industries: ADSK files as Services-Prepackaged Software; FTNT as Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC.
- Offset fiscal calendars: ADSK's year ends January 31 and FTNT's December 31, about 1 month apart.
- Profitability: net margin of 15.6% for ADSK versus 27.3% for FTNT.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT)
Fortinet sells integrated cybersecurity appliances and software combining networking and security in a single fabric.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves ADSK
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for ADSK. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-03-03.
What moves FTNT
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for FTNT. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-25.
The investment question
You now know how ADSK and FTNT are classified, when their fiscal years end, and where their exposures overlap. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to artificial intelligence, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
- Issue 07: The Vote That Knocked Almost a Quarter off Data Center Stocks
Texas has frozen new data center approvals since the summer. The vote extends that freeze, but it cannot unplug campuses that already have power. We map who is exposed, test whether the sell-off overshot and say where the real risk sits.
- Citadel bought the AI fire sale. The seller had run out of time.
Up 439% in the first half, down about 67% in July: how an AI hedge fund ended up selling a roughly $16 billion stock book to Citadel at a discount.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. ADSK's fiscal year ends January 31, while FTNT's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 9 matched transaction rows for ADSK and 17 matched transaction rows for FTNT. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
ADSK primary filings
FTNT primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
ADSK vs FTNT FAQs
Are ADSK and FTNT direct competitors?
Not necessarily. Autodesk files as Services-Prepackaged Software and Fortinet as Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC. The pair is compared because both map to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.
Is ADSK or FTNT the bigger company by revenue?
Autodesk (ADSK) and Fortinet (FTNT) reported similar revenue: $7.2B (fiscal year ended Jan 2026) versus $6.8B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). ADSK's net margin was 15.6% and FTNT's 27.3%. The SEC classifies them differently (Services-Prepackaged Software; Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, ADSK or FTNT?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this ADSK vs FTNT comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Autodesk, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
ADSK vs FTNT compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included