MOS vs NEM: how the two businesses compare

  • Bigger business: NEM, with $22.7B of yearly revenue, about 1.9× MOS's $12.1B.
  • More profitable: NEM keeps 31 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 4 cents at MOS.
  • More cash from each sale: NEM turns 46 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 7 cents at MOS.

From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.

Newmont (NEM) is the larger business by reported revenue: $22.7B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 1.9× MOS's $12.1B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). MOS's net margin was 4.5% and NEM's 31.3%. The SEC classifies them differently (Agricultural Chemicals; Gold and Silver Ores); what connects them is shared exposure to the Economic trends research theme, not a common industry.

Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.

Sector
Materials
SEC industry
Different
Separate classifications
Fiscal year ends
December 31
Same calendar
Reviewed
Mar 17, 2026

MOS vs NEM: quick comparison

Company factMOSNEM
CompanyThe Mosaic CompanyNewmont Corporation
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Headquarters—Denver, Colorado
Founded—1921
SEC industryAgricultural ChemicalsGold and Silver Ores
Fiscal year-endDecember 31December 31
Latest annual filing10-K/A · 2026-03-1710-K · 2026-02-19

MOS vs NEM: audited financials

  • Scale: NEM's $22.7B of revenue is about 1.9× MOS's $12.1B.
  • Net margin: NEM kept 31.3% of revenue as net income versus 4.5% at MOS.
  • Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled MOS 6.8% of revenue, or 1.52× net income; NEM 45.6% of revenue, or 1.46× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
  • Periods: both fiscal years end on 2025-12-31, so these annual figures cover the same months.

MOS: FY ending 2025-12-31 · NEM: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

Where MOS and NEM overlap, and where they don't

Overlap

  • Shared research theme: Economic trends.
  • Same fiscal calendar: both fiscal years end December 31.

Differences

  • Different SEC industries: MOS files as Agricultural Chemicals; NEM as Gold and Silver Ores.
  • Only MOS maps to Tariffs & trade.
  • Only NEM maps to International markets.
  • Scale: NEM reported about 1.9× the annual revenue of MOS.
  • Profitability: net margin of 4.5% for MOS versus 31.3% for NEM.

Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.

The Mosaic Company (MOS)

Mosaic produces phosphate and potash crop nutrients for farmers worldwide.

Newmont Corporation (NEM)

Newmont is the world's largest gold-mining company, with operations spread across the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Its earnings move with gold prices, which often rise during periods of economic uncertainty.

What moves each company

Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.

What moves MOS

We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for MOS. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K/A filed 2026-03-17.

What moves NEM

We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for NEM. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-19.

The investment question

You now know NEM reports about 1.9× MOS's revenue, and NEM keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to economic trends, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.

Members-only research

Members-only research on MOS and NEM

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.

Read the full research

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. Both fiscal years end December 31, so annual reports line up, but check segment definitions before comparing growth or margins.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 4 matched transaction rows for MOS and 8 matched transaction rows for NEM. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

MOS vs NEM FAQs

Are MOS and NEM direct competitors?

Not necessarily. Mosaic files as Agricultural Chemicals and Newmont as Gold and Silver Ores. The pair is compared because both map to the Economic trends research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.

Is MOS or NEM the bigger company by revenue?

Newmont (NEM) is the larger business by reported revenue: $22.7B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 1.9× MOS's $12.1B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). MOS's net margin was 4.5% and NEM's 31.3%. The SEC classifies them differently (Agricultural Chemicals; Gold and Silver Ores); what connects them is shared exposure to the Economic trends research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.

Which is better, MOS or NEM?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this MOS vs NEM comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers The Mosaic Company and Newmont Corporation tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-09. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-09. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?

MOS vs NEM compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.

$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included