Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)
Palo Alto Networks provides next-generation firewalls, cloud security, and AI-driven threat detection for enterprises.
PANW vs PLTR: how the two businesses compare
- Bigger business: PANW, with $9.2B of yearly revenue, about 2.1× PLTR's $4.5B.
- More profitable: PLTR keeps 36 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 12 cents at PANW.
- More cash from each sale: PLTR turns 48 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 40 cents at PANW.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the larger business by reported revenue: $9.2B in its fiscal year ended Jul 2025, about 2.1× PLTR's $4.5B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). PANW's net margin was 12.3% and PLTR's 36.3%. The SEC classifies them differently (Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC; Services-Prepackaged Software); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry.
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Information Technology
- Different
- Separate classifications
- Different
- PANW July 31 · PLTR December 31
- Sep 10, 2026
PANW vs PLTR: quick comparison
| Company fact | PANW | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | Palantir Technologies Inc. |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Headquarters | — | Denver, Colorado |
| Founded | — | 2003 |
| SEC industry | Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC | Services-Prepackaged Software |
| Fiscal year-end | July 31 | December 31 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-09-10 | 10-K · 2026-02-17 |
PANW vs PLTR: audited financials
- Scale: PANW's $9.2B of revenue is about 2.1× PLTR's $4.5B.
- Net margin: PLTR kept 36.3% of revenue as net income versus 12.3% at PANW.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled PANW 40.3% of revenue, or 3.28× net income; PLTR 47.7% of revenue, or 1.31× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: the fiscal years end about 5 months apart (2025-07-31 for PANW, 2025-12-31 for PLTR), so each figure reflects somewhat different demand and cost conditions.
| Metric | PANW | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2B2024-08-01 to 2025-07-31 · SEC filing | $4.5B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net income | $1.1B2024-08-01 to 2025-07-31 · SEC filing | $1.6B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $3.7B2024-08-01 to 2025-07-31 · SEC filing | $2.1B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | $1.602024-08-01 to 2025-07-31 · SEC filing | $0.632025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | 12.3%2024-08-01 to 2025-07-31 · SEC filing | 36.3%2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
PANW: FY ending 2025-07-31 · PLTR: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where PANW and PLTR overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Shared research theme: Artificial intelligence.
Differences
- Different SEC industries: PANW files as Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC; PLTR as Services-Prepackaged Software.
- Offset fiscal calendars: PANW's year ends July 31 and PLTR's December 31, about 5 months apart.
- Only PLTR maps to Wars & geopolitics.
- Scale: PANW reported about 2.1× the annual revenue of PLTR.
- Profitability: net margin of 12.3% for PANW versus 36.3% for PLTR.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)
Palantir builds data-integration and analytics platforms used by defense agencies, intelligence services, and commercial enterprises. Its AI platform for operational decision-making has driven rapid growth in its commercial business.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves PANW
- Next-Generation Security annualized recurring revenue
- Platformization deals that consolidate point products onto Strata, Prisma, and Cortex
- Mix of hardware firewall product revenue versus subscription and support
- Distributor concentration and channel partner performance
What moves PLTR
- Growth and renewal of US and allied government contracts, including defense and intelligence work
- Adoption speed of the Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) among commercial customers
- Commercial revenue mix shift and net dollar retention outside of government
- Valuation relative to growth, given the stock's premium multiple versus software peers
The investment question
You now know PANW reports about 2.1× PLTR's revenue, and PLTR keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about “Next-Generation Security annualized recurring revenue” at PANW and “Growth and renewal of US and allied government contracts, including defense and intelligence work” at PLTR, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
- Issue 07: The Vote That Knocked Almost a Quarter off Data Center Stocks
Texas has frozen new data center approvals since the summer. The vote extends that freeze, but it cannot unplug campuses that already have power. We map who is exposed, test whether the sell-off overshot and say where the real risk sits.
- Citadel bought the AI fire sale. The seller had run out of time.
Up 439% in the first half, down about 67% in July: how an AI hedge fund ended up selling a roughly $16 billion stock book to Citadel at a discount.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. PANW's fiscal year ends July 31, while PLTR's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 37 matched transaction rows for PANW and 50 matched transaction rows for PLTR. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
PANW primary filings
PLTR primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
PANW vs PLTR FAQs
Are PANW and PLTR direct competitors?
Not necessarily. Palo Alto Networks files as Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC and Palantir Technologies as Services-Prepackaged Software. The pair is compared because both map to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.
Is PANW or PLTR the bigger company by revenue?
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the larger business by reported revenue: $9.2B in its fiscal year ended Jul 2025, about 2.1× PLTR's $4.5B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). PANW's net margin was 12.3% and PLTR's 36.3%. The SEC classifies them differently (Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC; Services-Prepackaged Software); what connects them is shared exposure to the Artificial intelligence research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, PANW or PLTR?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this PANW vs PLTR comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-11-10. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-11-10. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
PANW vs PLTR compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included