Yield Theory

Industrials stock comparison

HWM vs LMT: which business are you actually underwriting?

Compare Howmet Aerospace Inc. with Lockheed Martin Corporation using their business models, SEC classifications, fiscal calendars, current primary filings, and the research questions that matter. This is a thesis framework—not a price target or automatic winner.
Sector
Industrials
Industry
Different SIC
Shared themes
1
Updated
2026-02-12

HWM vs LMT: quick comparison

Company factHWMLMT
CompanyHowmet Aerospace Inc.Lockheed Martin Corporation
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Headquarters—Bethesda, Maryland
Founded—1995
SEC industryRolling Drawing & Extruding of Nonferrous MetalsGuided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts
Fiscal year-endDecember 31December 31
Latest annual filing10-K · 2026-02-1210-K · 2026-01-29

HWM vs LMT: audited financials

LMT reported about 9.1× the revenue of HWM in the latest audited fiscal year. On profitability, HWM converted a larger share of revenue into net income (18.3% versus 6.7%). Scale and margin are starting facts for the thesis, not the verdict.

MetricHWMLMT
Revenue$8.3B$75.0B
Net income$1.5B$5.0B
Operating cash flow$1.9B$8.6B
Diluted EPS$3.71$21.49
Net margin18.3%6.7%

HWM: FY ending 2025-12-31 · LMT: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.

How the businesses differ

Why this pair belongs in the comparison set

HWM and LMT have different SEC industry classifications, but both map to the maintained Wars & geopolitics research theme inside the Industrials sector. A shared classification or theme makes the pair useful for a defined research question; it does not mean the companies have identical products, economics, or risks.

Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM)

Howmet Aerospace makes engineered metal components such as jet-engine parts and fasteners for aircraft.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

Lockheed Martin is the world's largest defense contractor, best known for the F-35 fighter program along with missiles, satellites, and space systems. Its revenue is dominated by long-term US government contracts.

The useful starting point is not which ticker has performed better. It is whether the two companies convert the same economic forces into revenue and cash flow in the same way. HWM is classified by the SEC as Rolling Drawing & Extruding of Nonferrous Metals, while LMT is classified as Guided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts. The different industry codes are a warning against treating sector membership as proof of identical economics.

Members-only research

What members are reading this month

The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $15 a month.

Read the full research

Which thesis does each company fit?

Use the distinction below to decide which filing deserves deeper work. It is a research routing rule, not a recommendation or prediction.

Study HWM when…

  • Capital-spending and manufacturing PMIs
  • Reshoring and supply-chain reconfiguration
  • Defense budgets and geopolitical conflict
  • Freight rates and logistics demand

Study LMT when…

  • Capital-spending and manufacturing PMIs
  • Reshoring and supply-chain reconfiguration
  • Defense budgets and geopolitical conflict
  • Freight rates and logistics demand

Shared research themes

Wars & geopolitics

SEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence

Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable.HWM's fiscal year ends December 31, while LMT's ends December 31. Normalize the reporting periods before comparing growth, margins, capital intensity, or guidance.

The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 14matched transaction rows for HWMand 24 for LMT. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.

What this comparison cannot tell you

This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.

A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.

HWM vs LMT FAQs

Are HWM and LMT direct competitors?

Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation sit in the same Industrials sector but have different SEC industry classifications. The comparison is most useful for portfolio role and sector exposure, not as a claim that every product competes directly.

Which is better, HWM or LMT?

There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.

Does this HWM vs LMT comparison include live prices?

No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.

Where does the company information come from?

Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-09-25. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.

Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-09-25. Independent educational research; not investment advice.

A comparison is the setup. The thesis is the call.

HWM vs LMT shows how the businesses differ. Membership is the monthly sourced view of who could benefit, what could break, and what evidence matters next. $15/month or $150/year.

$15/mo or $150/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included