C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW)
C.H. Robinson is a freight broker and logistics provider connecting shippers with carriers.
Industrials stock comparison
CHRW vs LII: how the two businesses compare
- Bigger business: CHRW, with $16.2B of yearly revenue, about 3.1× LII's $5.2B.
- More profitable: LII keeps 16 cents of each sales dollar as profit, against 4 cents at CHRW.
- More cash from each sale: LII turns 15 cents of each sales dollar into operating cash flow, against 6 cents at CHRW.
From each company's latest annual SEC filing. Fiscal years can end on different dates.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the larger business by reported revenue: $16.2B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 3.1× LII's $5.2B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). CHRW's net margin was 3.6% and LII's 15.5%. The SEC classifies them differently (Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo; Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip); what connects them is shared exposure to the Economic trends research theme, not a common industry.
Figures come from each company's own SEC filings. This page compares the businesses; it is not a price target or a verdict.
- Sector
- Industrials
- SEC industry
- Different
- Separate classifications
- Fiscal year ends
- December 31
- Same calendar
- Reviewed
- Feb 17, 2026
CHRW vs LII: quick comparison
| Company fact | CHRW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Company | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Lennox International Inc. |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| SEC industry | Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo | Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip |
| Fiscal year-end | December 31 | December 31 |
| Latest annual filing | 10-K · 2026-02-13 | 10-K · 2026-02-17 |
CHRW vs LII: audited financials
- Scale: CHRW's $16.2B of revenue is about 3.1× LII's $5.2B.
- Net margin: LII kept 15.5% of revenue as net income versus 3.6% at CHRW.
- Cash conversion: operating cash flow equalled CHRW 5.6% of revenue, or 1.56× net income; LII 14.6% of revenue, or 0.94× net income. A ratio well above 1× usually reflects non-cash charges or working-capital release; well below 1× can reflect working-capital build or non-cash gains.
- Periods: both fiscal years end on 2025-12-31, so these annual figures cover the same months.
| Metric | CHRW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.2B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $5.2B2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net income | $587M2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $806M2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Operating cash flow | $915M2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $758M2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Diluted EPS | $4.832025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | $22.792025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
| Net margin | 3.6%2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing | 15.5%2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31 · SEC filing |
CHRW: FY ending 2025-12-31 · LII: FY ending 2025-12-31. Figures as tagged in each issuer's SEC XBRL filing; fiscal calendars may not align.
Where CHRW and LII overlap, and where they don't
Overlap
- Shared research theme: Economic trends.
- Same fiscal calendar: both fiscal years end December 31.
Differences
- Different SEC industries: CHRW files as Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo; LII as Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip.
- Scale: CHRW reported about 3.1× the annual revenue of LII.
- Profitability: net margin of 3.6% for CHRW versus 15.5% for LII.
Overlap is drawn from SEC classifications and Yield Theory research themes. It is not evidence that the companies sell to the same customers or compete product for product.
Lennox International Inc. (LII)
Lennox International makes heating, air-conditioning, and refrigeration systems for homes and businesses.
What moves each company
Company-specific drivers maintained by Yield Theory. Use them to decide which filing deserves deeper work; they are not predictions.
What moves CHRW
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for CHRW. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-13.
What moves LII
We have not yet published a company-specific driver list for LII. The primary source is Item 1 (Business) and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of its 10-K filed 2026-02-17.
The investment question
You now know CHRW reports about 3.1× LII's revenue, and LII keeps more of each dollar as net income. Those are the facts. The investment question is what each share price already assumes about their exposure to economic trends, and which evidence in the next filings would prove that assumption wrong.
Members-only research
What members are reading this month
Sep 22, 2026
Meta jumped 11%. What must happen next to justify the price?A member research report on Meta’s AI rally: Muse, subscription economics, the cash-flow burden, legal costs and the earnings assumptions behind the new price.
Sep 9, 2026
Seagate: More Terabytes, Better EconomicsA retrospective case study of Seagate’s capacity-density thesis as of January 28, 2026, separating known qualifications and financials from an uncertain next phase.
The thesis, the numbers behind it, and what would break it. Full access is $39 a month.
Read the full researchSEC filing comparison and disclosure evidence
Start with primary filings because fiscal calendars and accounting presentation can make superficially similar quarters incomparable. Both fiscal years end December 31, so annual reports line up, but check segment definitions before comparing growth or margins.
The current verified House and Senate snapshot contains 20 matched transaction rows for CHRW and 0 matched transaction rows for LII. These delayed, range-based disclosures can identify a filing to inspect; they do not establish motive, conviction, or a real-time trading signal.
CHRW primary filings
LII primary filings
What this comparison cannot tell you
This page does not contain licensed live prices, a valuation model, earnings estimates, portfolio constraints, or a forecast of future returns. SEC classifications can be broad, company descriptions can lag strategic change, and the latest annual filing may predate a material acquisition or divestiture. Read subsequent quarterly and current reports before making a decision.
A stronger business is not automatically the better stock. Starting valuation, expectations, capital structure, cyclicality, dilution, and the probability of each thesis determine the investment outcome. Use this comparison to frame the work, then verify the numbers in the linked filings and current company disclosures.
More comparisons involving CHRW or LII
CHRW vs LII FAQs
Are CHRW and LII direct competitors?
Not necessarily. C.H. Robinson Worldwide files as Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo and Lennox International as Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip. The pair is compared because both map to the Economic trends research theme, not because the filings show head-to-head competition.
Is CHRW or LII the bigger company by revenue?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the larger business by reported revenue: $16.2B in its fiscal year ended Dec 2025, about 3.1× LII's $5.2B (fiscal year ended Dec 2025). CHRW's net margin was 3.6% and LII's 15.5%. The SEC classifies them differently (Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo; Air-Cond & Warm Air Heatg Equip & Comm & Indl Refrig Equip); what connects them is shared exposure to the Economic trends research theme, not a common industry. Each figure is the annual amount tagged in the company's own SEC XBRL filing; market value depends on live prices, which this page does not publish.
Which is better, CHRW or LII?
There is no context-free winner. Compare the operating exposures, filing evidence, valuation, balance sheet, and risks against the specific thesis you are testing. This page deliberately does not turn a static profile into a buy or sell recommendation.
Does this CHRW vs LII comparison include live prices?
No. Yield Theory does not republish unlicensed real-time market data. The financial figures on this page are the audited annual numbers C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Lennox International Inc. tagged in their SEC XBRL filings. Use a regulated broker or licensed quote provider for current prices and valuation multiples.
Where does the company information come from?
Company classifications, fiscal year-ends, and filing links come from the SEC EDGAR submissions API snapshot refreshed 2026-10-03. Business summaries and research themes are maintained by Yield Theory.
Data snapshot: SEC EDGAR submissions API, refreshed 2026-10-03. Independent educational research; not investment advice.
Which business differences matter to the investment thesis?
CHRW vs LII compares reported results. The reports below show how we connect operating evidence to an investment thesis, its assumptions, catalysts, and risks. $39/month or $249/year.
Members-only research
$39/mo or $249/yr · cancel future renewals anytime · sources included